The Rhetorical Impulse Some stories are compelling and others are not. This one was not but it was well packaged and carefully publicised as if it were. The trailer was designed with certain cultural, if not ideological, identifications in mind. It said, "This is an interesting film because Sean Penn puts on make-up as he chases a war criminal." By the time I realise I've been tricked, I've given over the money at the box-office. It's too late. It was my choice but I was duped twice. The film is made attractively, in such a way as to make one feel uneasy about saying how it sucks. One is supposed to get something out of seeing a film like this. No? (Perhaps it's my fault for not being sensitive enough to appreciate it.) Bunkum! I was just ripped off by a bad film and yet because it's attractive visually, it's one of those that one can pretend to have enjoyed.
The rhetorical impulse, i.e. the wish to explain - so prevalent in today's overly politicised world, is absent in films by Francois Truffaut or Alfred Hitchcock. Their work draws you in completely into the story as if in a dream. There are no easy humour nor pointless one-liners, only parts that fit to make a story well told. |
Bevagna, 26 10 2011